Alderman At-Large Dan Moriarty Biography

About Alderman At-Large Dan Moriarty

You almost certainly know one famous person from my home town of Atchison, Kansas: Amelia Earhart. It's unlikely you know that she grew up on the same street as me although obviously not at the same time. I like to tell people that I grew up in the inner city - inner city Atchison, Kansas, population 13,000. Typical of most mid-western towns the streets are laid out in a grid and there's an alley between every street. My neighborhood is 1/4 acre zoning so the houses are surprisingly closely spaced for being in a state with so much open space.

Atchison looks very similar to Nashua's North End with all its Victorian homes. My mom's house was (still is) a medium sized Victorian with a big porch in front. Since Atchison was settled in the 1760's it is filled with many impressive homes made of stone and brick, one with a set of gargoyles on the roof keeping watch. The house I grew up in is still there, same phone number since before I was born. A symbol of stability and reliability that has contributed to my personality.

Atchison residents are mostly blue collar, with the largest employer being the steel foundry along the river, formerly owned by Rockwell. Their claim to fame is having the ability to make the largest (at least while I lived there) single-pour castings: tank turrets, railroad trucks, etc.The second largest employer is Midwest Grain Products. Allegedly they produced more alcohol than any other location in the country, used in low-cost beverages such as vodka and gin that comes in plastic jugs and the grain-mash would be used for livestock feed.

I went to Central School (public) from K-5 and walked to and from home since 1st grade. Imagine these days letting your 6 year old walk home from school, make a snack, and wait for you to return home from work. note: never in my life did I have a key to my house because we never locked our doors. We often toss our car keys on the floor when we get out to go shopping. I spent the weekends with my dad who travelled during the week as a sales rep in the casting industry. My mom worked full time to support us five kids first as a waitress then for most of her career keeping the books for payroll at Rockwell. There were days I was home sick from school watching educational TV on PBS. My mom would call from work to check up on me (which annoyed me to no end). Now days that would be frowned upon but the whole arrangement instilled a sense of personal responsibility.

My dad was a sports nut and as such I first started competing in swimming when I was 6 and "retired" when I was 11. After that it was baseball, football, basketball, and soccer. Eventually I managed to stop playing basketball which I was never any good at and wrestled instead. By the end of high school it was just cross-country in the fall and track in the spring. I ran every single day for three years and managed to get 11th at the state champs in the 2 mile (10:02) and 4th in the 4x800 relay (8:17). The next day I hung up my shoes and essentially didn't run again until the summer before my 30th birthday....because while at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology my main focus was academics. There were times during the latter parts of the semesters when there weren't enough hours in the week to get everything done. So, we would skip lectures in order to get the homework done. Quizzes were a treat because it meant there was no eight hour homework assignment due that week. I was in electrical engineering which was the largest department at the Institute. I remember one class being so oversubscribed, (MIT had a policy that you could go to any class you wanted without ever having to get on a wait list) that the professor decided to crank up the difficulty of the homework until the students began to drop out of the class. Eventually through attrition he got the class down to a manageable size. (6.013, fall junior year.)

Aside from the obvious technical training, probably the single biggest thing I learned from MIT was what I call their "No Excuses Policy." If there was an assignment due on Monday and a gigantic snow storm left two feet of snow on Saturday morning making it next to impossible to get to the lab, the assignment was still due. You were supposed to know the storm was coming and start early. If there was any conceivable way the work could get done it shall be done. At the same time the students could apply this policy on the administration. There better be benches and test equipment available. The electronics better be available, and same with the teaching staff. The 'Tute gave us infinite resources and flexibility to accomplish our work and expected nothing short of perfection.

After getting a doctorate in applied physics in the department of Nuclear Engineering, my first job was in Los Angeles at TRW, an aerospace and security company. After two years I returned to New England to join the MIT Lincoln Lab, then four years at a telecom startup. Most recently, 9 years at BAE Systems where I am now. This is a great place to work: almost no corporate politics, a meritocracy, plenty of resources, driven toward deliverables. It's a lot like MIT; but, without the competition between peers. In my role as Alderman I often resort to my experience at my current employer as a guide of how things should function. At the moment I envision myself retiring here at BAE Systems.

I have one real hobby: racing triathlon. It's almost a profession since I train about 10 hours per week (150 miles on the bike, 25 miles running, 2 hours in the pool). My first race was in Hyannis, Mass in 1999. Since then I've competed in about 50 triathlons from sprint, to Olympic distance, to half-Ironman. I've raced three times for Team USA at the Age Group World Championships: Gold Coast, Australia; Budapest, Hungary; and Beijing, China. My best ranked performance was 10th in my age group at the Beijing World Champs.

My four kids keep me busy every other weekend and a few weeks a year. Amelia is now 13 and after a great first season of track is back to ballet. Rebecca, 11, is interested in gymnastics and saving money. Charlotte, 11, likes ballet and has a goofy sense of humor like her brother. Owen, 8, just finished his first season of T-ball. The girls, especially Amelia, are amazing artists.

Nashua suits me. It has everything I need and no traffic. But, I do miss the thunderstorms of Kansas' springs.

Monday, November 24, 2014

Passenger Rail Study Summary Presentation Nov 20th

Thursday’s summary presentation of the recently concluded passenger rail study was exactly what most people in the audience came to hear. Unfortunately a key element was missing – the persuasive argument to convince those who are skeptical. The intangible benefits of rail are obvious to many of us and so we are inclined to forgive when we don’t receive a high level of tangible certainty. To many others the unknown risks outweigh its benefits so they focus on the facts actually displayed on the big screen primarily the large capital costs and subsidy requirements.

 In the business of defense contracting once an opportunity has been officially posted it is illegal to campaign to the offering committee on one’s behalf. We are forced to make our case in 11 point Ariel, 20 pages maximum for example. We cannot simply ask a group of state legislators to vote for us because we are ideologically aligned. Instead the contracting decisions are based on facts defensible in a court of law. I am naturally inclined to approach the new majority in Concord in this way - as customers whom I am obligated to persuade. I believe we stand a good chance of success if we take the time to learn their language so they might receive our message.

Their language is one of maximizing economic benefit while minimizing government involvement. Using this as our guide we can build a case from one key fact offered to us at the rail study presentation – an investment of ten million dollars per year results in about 5000 full time jobs. A quick estimate suggests that 5000 full time jobs equates to approximately 500 million dollars of economy. I base this on previous rail studies that predict an average income of 50 thousand dollars per year and an equal value of commercial revenue. In summary that’s a return on investment of 50:1. An experienced entrepreneur could strengthen the argument by comparing this passenger rail ROI to other proposals for funding being submitted to the state and municipal governments.

It is also commonplace in crafting proposals to address the primary counter-arguments of the competition as well as those in the minds of the source selection committee. In this case we know one of those to be the idea that if the generated revenues are so large then a profit making venture should take the lead. A crucial step here is to recognize that there are no direct mechanisms for a private company to extract the revenues generated by the commuter rail; whereas, state and local government are capable of receiving the necessary fraction of those revenues through the mechanisms already in place such as business taxes. In fact this is the basis of those who support increasing state revenues via reduced tax rates. The near-term shortfall is closed by the expanded economy of the future.

If time and budget remains in the contract I urge the managers of the Feasibility Study to focus resources toward preparing the case to move forward. For commuter rail to gain the support of our state government it is paramount that its proponents can defend the statement that “passenger rail can and will pay for itself.”
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)