Last night's Board of Aldermen went well into the night, ending at 11:30 pm. The primary issue was the proposal to allow the Legacy Playground be located on the west side of Greeley Park. That resolution got re-referred to the Infrastructure Committee and a new Resolution to fund a location study was referred to the Finance Committee. (The police supervisors contract passed.)
The Infrastructure ...Committee will likely table the playground resolution to wait for the study. The study resolution will return to the BoA in two weeks and there may be another lengthy discussion. Hopefully the study will proceed and then sometime in the coming weeks depending on the results of the study there will either be a public hearing on the location the infrastructure committee recommends or there will be a discussion in the BoA to indefinitely postpone the playground resolution.
As I see it the idea of creating a wonderful playground has nearly unanimous support (including me). The decision for the BoA is whether it should be allowed to be in Greeley Park. The reason I use the word "allowed" is because there is a 20 year ordinance establishing a moratorium on development in Greeley Park. The moratorium is for good reason; Greeley Park deserves special consideration to preserve it as an open space.
The decision of whether or not the playground should be allowed into Greeley Park can be based on its location within the park and the impacts on the location. The positive impact of the playground is indeed the playground as a resource. But, the primary negative impact of the playground will be the parking necessary for it to be handicapped accessible to the widest extent possible. There are many locations across the city where the impact of a parking lot - which will be larger than the playground itself - are not viewed negatively. There may even be a location within Greeley Park that can accommodate a substantial parking lot, such as on the East side near the horseshoe pits.
I am confident that there are many locations around the city that will be equally suitable for this excellent playground idea. The points made by the people who attended the BoA meeting last night who spoke in support of the playground could just as well make their points in support of the playground in another more suitable location.
The Aldermen will need to decide whether Greeley Park can support such a substantial project. If the answer is yes then we will pass the resolution and the Legacy Playground will be allowed to be located at a specific spot. If the answer is no then we will not pass the resolution. We may suggest a better location but at that point the BoA no longer has jurisdiction and the Board of Public Works will take over.
If we vote no for having the wonderful but very large and resource rich Legacy Playground in Greeley Park, that doesn't mean that there will never be a swing set there. It just means that we will maintain a modest playground that doesn't attempt to provide all the features of the Legacy Playground. Just a simple swing set or two at Greeley and then "down the street" there will be a playground with all the bells and whistles and double-wide parking spots to accommodate handicap accessible vans, and new bathrooms, and...
The Infrastructure ...Committee will likely table the playground resolution to wait for the study. The study resolution will return to the BoA in two weeks and there may be another lengthy discussion. Hopefully the study will proceed and then sometime in the coming weeks depending on the results of the study there will either be a public hearing on the location the infrastructure committee recommends or there will be a discussion in the BoA to indefinitely postpone the playground resolution.
As I see it the idea of creating a wonderful playground has nearly unanimous support (including me). The decision for the BoA is whether it should be allowed to be in Greeley Park. The reason I use the word "allowed" is because there is a 20 year ordinance establishing a moratorium on development in Greeley Park. The moratorium is for good reason; Greeley Park deserves special consideration to preserve it as an open space.
The decision of whether or not the playground should be allowed into Greeley Park can be based on its location within the park and the impacts on the location. The positive impact of the playground is indeed the playground as a resource. But, the primary negative impact of the playground will be the parking necessary for it to be handicapped accessible to the widest extent possible. There are many locations across the city where the impact of a parking lot - which will be larger than the playground itself - are not viewed negatively. There may even be a location within Greeley Park that can accommodate a substantial parking lot, such as on the East side near the horseshoe pits.
I am confident that there are many locations around the city that will be equally suitable for this excellent playground idea. The points made by the people who attended the BoA meeting last night who spoke in support of the playground could just as well make their points in support of the playground in another more suitable location.
The Aldermen will need to decide whether Greeley Park can support such a substantial project. If the answer is yes then we will pass the resolution and the Legacy Playground will be allowed to be located at a specific spot. If the answer is no then we will not pass the resolution. We may suggest a better location but at that point the BoA no longer has jurisdiction and the Board of Public Works will take over.
If we vote no for having the wonderful but very large and resource rich Legacy Playground in Greeley Park, that doesn't mean that there will never be a swing set there. It just means that we will maintain a modest playground that doesn't attempt to provide all the features of the Legacy Playground. Just a simple swing set or two at Greeley and then "down the street" there will be a playground with all the bells and whistles and double-wide parking spots to accommodate handicap accessible vans, and new bathrooms, and...
No comments:
Post a Comment