Alderman At-Large Dan Moriarty Biography

About Alderman At-Large Dan Moriarty

You almost certainly know one famous person from my home town of Atchison, Kansas: Amelia Earhart. It's unlikely you know that she grew up on the same street as me although obviously not at the same time. I like to tell people that I grew up in the inner city - inner city Atchison, Kansas, population 13,000. Typical of most mid-western towns the streets are laid out in a grid and there's an alley between every street. My neighborhood is 1/4 acre zoning so the houses are surprisingly closely spaced for being in a state with so much open space.

Atchison looks very similar to Nashua's North End with all its Victorian homes. My mom's house was (still is) a medium sized Victorian with a big porch in front. Since Atchison was settled in the 1760's it is filled with many impressive homes made of stone and brick, one with a set of gargoyles on the roof keeping watch. The house I grew up in is still there, same phone number since before I was born. A symbol of stability and reliability that has contributed to my personality.

Atchison residents are mostly blue collar, with the largest employer being the steel foundry along the river, formerly owned by Rockwell. Their claim to fame is having the ability to make the largest (at least while I lived there) single-pour castings: tank turrets, railroad trucks, etc.The second largest employer is Midwest Grain Products. Allegedly they produced more alcohol than any other location in the country, used in low-cost beverages such as vodka and gin that comes in plastic jugs and the grain-mash would be used for livestock feed.

I went to Central School (public) from K-5 and walked to and from home since 1st grade. Imagine these days letting your 6 year old walk home from school, make a snack, and wait for you to return home from work. note: never in my life did I have a key to my house because we never locked our doors. We often toss our car keys on the floor when we get out to go shopping. I spent the weekends with my dad who travelled during the week as a sales rep in the casting industry. My mom worked full time to support us five kids first as a waitress then for most of her career keeping the books for payroll at Rockwell. There were days I was home sick from school watching educational TV on PBS. My mom would call from work to check up on me (which annoyed me to no end). Now days that would be frowned upon but the whole arrangement instilled a sense of personal responsibility.

My dad was a sports nut and as such I first started competing in swimming when I was 6 and "retired" when I was 11. After that it was baseball, football, basketball, and soccer. Eventually I managed to stop playing basketball which I was never any good at and wrestled instead. By the end of high school it was just cross-country in the fall and track in the spring. I ran every single day for three years and managed to get 11th at the state champs in the 2 mile (10:02) and 4th in the 4x800 relay (8:17). The next day I hung up my shoes and essentially didn't run again until the summer before my 30th birthday....because while at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology my main focus was academics. There were times during the latter parts of the semesters when there weren't enough hours in the week to get everything done. So, we would skip lectures in order to get the homework done. Quizzes were a treat because it meant there was no eight hour homework assignment due that week. I was in electrical engineering which was the largest department at the Institute. I remember one class being so oversubscribed, (MIT had a policy that you could go to any class you wanted without ever having to get on a wait list) that the professor decided to crank up the difficulty of the homework until the students began to drop out of the class. Eventually through attrition he got the class down to a manageable size. (6.013, fall junior year.)

Aside from the obvious technical training, probably the single biggest thing I learned from MIT was what I call their "No Excuses Policy." If there was an assignment due on Monday and a gigantic snow storm left two feet of snow on Saturday morning making it next to impossible to get to the lab, the assignment was still due. You were supposed to know the storm was coming and start early. If there was any conceivable way the work could get done it shall be done. At the same time the students could apply this policy on the administration. There better be benches and test equipment available. The electronics better be available, and same with the teaching staff. The 'Tute gave us infinite resources and flexibility to accomplish our work and expected nothing short of perfection.

After getting a doctorate in applied physics in the department of Nuclear Engineering, my first job was in Los Angeles at TRW, an aerospace and security company. After two years I returned to New England to join the MIT Lincoln Lab, then four years at a telecom startup. Most recently, 9 years at BAE Systems where I am now. This is a great place to work: almost no corporate politics, a meritocracy, plenty of resources, driven toward deliverables. It's a lot like MIT; but, without the competition between peers. In my role as Alderman I often resort to my experience at my current employer as a guide of how things should function. At the moment I envision myself retiring here at BAE Systems.

I have one real hobby: racing triathlon. It's almost a profession since I train about 10 hours per week (150 miles on the bike, 25 miles running, 2 hours in the pool). My first race was in Hyannis, Mass in 1999. Since then I've competed in about 50 triathlons from sprint, to Olympic distance, to half-Ironman. I've raced three times for Team USA at the Age Group World Championships: Gold Coast, Australia; Budapest, Hungary; and Beijing, China. My best ranked performance was 10th in my age group at the Beijing World Champs.

My four kids keep me busy every other weekend and a few weeks a year. Amelia is now 13 and after a great first season of track is back to ballet. Rebecca, 11, is interested in gymnastics and saving money. Charlotte, 11, likes ballet and has a goofy sense of humor like her brother. Owen, 8, just finished his first season of T-ball. The girls, especially Amelia, are amazing artists.

Nashua suits me. It has everything I need and no traffic. But, I do miss the thunderstorms of Kansas' springs.

Monday, April 28, 2014

Pennichuck Water Works: Distribution Facility Move

Not a lot of glamour comes with being a conservationist. In the city-like atmosphere of Nashua I find usually it's a losing battle. The fight to save Parcel F (circa 2011) got pretty heated. One of our more ambitious volunteers, Ann Bannister, secured 200 petitions the old-fashioned way - door to door - but in the end the land still was developed into housing. Last summer I attempted to save the trees along Main St with the help of several hundred on-line petitioners. Last fall I joined a few of my neighbors at the ZBA to speak against a large development just around the corner from where I live but to no avail.

However once in a while you get a victory as with our ability to reduce a proposal on Kathy Drive from two houses being built in the Salmon Brook buffer zone to just one house.

Currently I have my fingers crossed that the Pennichuck Board of Directors will be successful in finding a location in Nashua for their distribution facilities rather than clearing a couple acres on land they own bordering Nashua right along DW Highway in Merrimack. I hope to hear good news sometime soon which I will pass along.

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/1034524-469/pennichucks-move-to-merrimack-still-in-limbo.html

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Finance Committee - Legacy Playground Location Study

There was one item on yesterday's Finance Committee meeting, the resolution to fund a study to advise regarding possible locations for a universally accessible playground.

There were three Aldermen in attendance who aren't on the committee who helped us make good use of our time exchanging ideas. There were about twenty people from the audience who spoke for and against the resolution.

My summary:
The Board of Aldermen is being asked to over-ride the twenty year moratorium on development in Greeley Park to allow the Legacy Playground be located there.

In my mind the decision comes down to two questions: does the Legacy Playground belong in Greeley Park? And, Is there no other location that is equally suitable? Because of the moratorium I feel that both of those questions must be answered "yes" to allow the project to proceed.

To answer the first question we must bear in mind that the problem is not necessarily with the playground itself but with the infrastructure, such as a parking lot, that is needed to support the playground. Simply, I don't believe a parking lot should be built over Greeley Park. A less ambitious playground should suffice.

Regarding the second question I believe that there is more than one location in this city suitable for such a playground. However it is fair for an aldermen to feel the need to have qualified and accurate data to help them draw a conclusion and then to use as a basis to defend their decision. Because this is such a significant issue it warrants the city spending a moderate fee for a study.

I feel the need to dispel the mischaracterization that the playground issue has been over-studied. To the contrary the closest thing resembling a study so far is the survey performed by the Leadership Greater Nashua group who have decided that the playground must be in Greeley Park. There are several specifics about that study which I find flawed. This sheds doubt on the validity of their survey. So, as I said at the meeting, just as when you purchase a car or a house you hire your own inspector.

Besides each of the aldermen drawing their own conclusion, it will be helpful to the city as a whole to have a third party's input - just as is often the case when two disagreeing parties enlist the help of a mediator. The Infrastructure Committee was proceeding at a good pace toward a consensus and discovered the need to have an outside professional's input.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Pennichuck Water Special Committee

BREAKING: Everybody gets along fine at committee meeting; chairman presides over new era of good feelings in Nashua

So went the headlines reporting on Monday's Pennichuck Water Special Committee. We had four representatives from Pennichuck Corp in attendance: Chairman of the Board of Directors Jay Leonard, CEO John Patenaude, COO Don Ware, and CFO Larry Goodhue.

The biggest item on the agenda w...as the proxy for the annual Shareholder's meeting on May 10th, 8:30 am, Courtyard Marriott. Three of the directors are up for re-election and one, Mr. James Dore, is up as a new appointment. Our committee voted to recommend to the full board that we approve their appointments.

There is an issue lingering regarding a space on the Board of Directors representing the Merrimack Valley Regional Water District. Because no one was nominated with the original board the by-laws imply that MVRWD no longer has sole appointment power. Nevertheless Chairman Leonard and Alderman Melizzi-Golja (our BoA representative on the MVRWD) agreed to work together to attempt to head off any contention. As the chairman presiding over the meeting I suggested that Mr. Leonard supply to the MVRWD a list of skills which the current BoD may be lacking which the MVRWD could possibly use as guidance for their selection.

We also authorized a loan and a line of credit for Pennichuck. It was standard operating procedure.

Thanks to the four from Pennichuck for taking the time to attend.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Legacy Playground

Last night's Board of Aldermen went well into the night, ending at 11:30 pm. The primary issue was the proposal to allow the Legacy Playground be located on the west side of Greeley Park. That resolution got re-referred to the Infrastructure Committee and a new Resolution to fund a location study was referred to the Finance Committee. (The police supervisors contract passed.)

The Infrastructure ...Committee will likely table the playground resolution to wait for the study. The study resolution will return to the BoA in two weeks and there may be another lengthy discussion. Hopefully the study will proceed and then sometime in the coming weeks depending on the results of the study there will either be a public hearing on the location the infrastructure committee recommends or there will be a discussion in the BoA to indefinitely postpone the playground resolution.

As I see it the idea of creating a wonderful playground has nearly unanimous support (including me). The decision for the BoA is whether it should be allowed to be in Greeley Park. The reason I use the word "allowed" is because there is a 20 year ordinance establishing a moratorium on development in Greeley Park. The moratorium is for good reason; Greeley Park deserves special consideration to preserve it as an open space.

The decision of whether or not the playground should be allowed into Greeley Park can be based on its location within the park and the impacts on the location. The positive impact of the playground is indeed the playground as a resource. But, the primary negative impact of the playground will be the parking necessary for it to be handicapped accessible to the widest extent possible. There are many locations across the city where the impact of a parking lot - which will be larger than the playground itself - are not viewed negatively. There may even be a location within Greeley Park that can accommodate a substantial parking lot, such as on the East side near the horseshoe pits.

I am confident that there are many locations around the city that will be equally suitable for this excellent playground idea. The points made by the people who attended the BoA meeting last night who spoke in support of the playground could just as well make their points in support of the playground in another more suitable location.

The Aldermen will need to decide whether Greeley Park can support such a substantial project. If the answer is yes then we will pass the resolution and the Legacy Playground will be allowed to be located at a specific spot. If the answer is no then we will not pass the resolution. We may suggest a better location but at that point the BoA no longer has jurisdiction and the Board of Public Works will take over.

If we vote no for having the wonderful but very large and resource rich Legacy Playground in Greeley Park, that doesn't mean that there will never be a swing set there. It just means that we will maintain a modest playground that doesn't attempt to provide all the features of the Legacy Playground. Just a simple swing set or two at Greeley and then "down the street" there will be a playground with all the bells and whistles and double-wide parking spots to accommodate handicap accessible vans, and new bathrooms, and...