A compromise has been reached! Contrary to statements made by LGN leadership in yesterday's newspaper guest editorial the report from The Study did not substantiate the position LGN has held all along.
The Study was conducted as a result of a resolution which I endorsed the day it was introduced. With two Aldermen named as its endorsers The Study Resolution was touch and go for a couple weeks until it was approved about a month ago. Last night we received a presentation by the two primary contractors for the company who performed the study. The two ladies were clearly professionals and experts in their field. It was a pleasure listening to the primary speaker. She had a grace and calmness which commanded respect and confidence and immediately disarmed any tensions or attacks. Like a star professional baseball player she responded with home run after home run to the questions tossed her way from the Aldermen. Once in a while we encounter an individual whose talent makes you want to just sit and watch in awe. Last night was one of those occasions.
The Summary: #1 location is the East Side of Greeley Park. If you scroll down on this page to January 14th you'll find me describe, via an analogy with the Boston Public Common, how I felt the East Side of Greeley Park would serve as a nice compromise as well as being a much more suitable location than on the West Side of Greeley Park. Meanwhile, over a year ago I requested through several channels including a commissioner on the Board of Public Works that Ward 9 be considered as a location. The Study selected Ward 9's Kirkpatrick Park as their 3rd favorite location. (Maybe all those mornings reading my horoscope are starting to pay off.)
My clairvoyancy notwithstanding, none of the top three locations selected by the hired professionals made the list proposed by LGN.
During the presentation we also learned that the playground equipment currently on the west side of Greeley Park is in actuality a treasure. This same equipment had been ridiculed during the series of public meetings leading up to the initiation of the study. We learned that that equipment has a pedigree from a time when we designed playgrounds to provide thrill and excitement. The professional conducting the study was so amazed - and pleased - at its existence that she took pictures (like an ornithologist photographing a nearly extinct Bald Eagle). We learned that it would be a terrible shame to remove that equipment which caters to the older children and those looking for a little more fun.
The older equipment on the west side to cater to the bigger kids. New equipment on the east side to cater to the little kids - and those with special needs. This is a solution that never entered my mind but is the kind of solution you get when you recognize your own limitations and take the time to solicit input from experts in their field.
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/1038573-469/aldermen-hear-from-playground-design-experts-on.html
The Study was conducted as a result of a resolution which I endorsed the day it was introduced. With two Aldermen named as its endorsers The Study Resolution was touch and go for a couple weeks until it was approved about a month ago. Last night we received a presentation by the two primary contractors for the company who performed the study. The two ladies were clearly professionals and experts in their field. It was a pleasure listening to the primary speaker. She had a grace and calmness which commanded respect and confidence and immediately disarmed any tensions or attacks. Like a star professional baseball player she responded with home run after home run to the questions tossed her way from the Aldermen. Once in a while we encounter an individual whose talent makes you want to just sit and watch in awe. Last night was one of those occasions.
The Summary: #1 location is the East Side of Greeley Park. If you scroll down on this page to January 14th you'll find me describe, via an analogy with the Boston Public Common, how I felt the East Side of Greeley Park would serve as a nice compromise as well as being a much more suitable location than on the West Side of Greeley Park. Meanwhile, over a year ago I requested through several channels including a commissioner on the Board of Public Works that Ward 9 be considered as a location. The Study selected Ward 9's Kirkpatrick Park as their 3rd favorite location. (Maybe all those mornings reading my horoscope are starting to pay off.)
My clairvoyancy notwithstanding, none of the top three locations selected by the hired professionals made the list proposed by LGN.
During the presentation we also learned that the playground equipment currently on the west side of Greeley Park is in actuality a treasure. This same equipment had been ridiculed during the series of public meetings leading up to the initiation of the study. We learned that that equipment has a pedigree from a time when we designed playgrounds to provide thrill and excitement. The professional conducting the study was so amazed - and pleased - at its existence that she took pictures (like an ornithologist photographing a nearly extinct Bald Eagle). We learned that it would be a terrible shame to remove that equipment which caters to the older children and those looking for a little more fun.
The older equipment on the west side to cater to the bigger kids. New equipment on the east side to cater to the little kids - and those with special needs. This is a solution that never entered my mind but is the kind of solution you get when you recognize your own limitations and take the time to solicit input from experts in their field.
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/1038573-469/aldermen-hear-from-playground-design-experts-on.html